THEME AND RATIONALE

The fifteenth annual Performance Studies international conference will take place in Zagreb, Croatia, June 24-28 2009. The theme of PSi # 15 is MISPERFORMANCE: Misfiring, Misfitting, Misreading. In determining the conference theme, our intention was to return to performance as the basic concept of our field. While we want to examine performance as a phenomenon, as experience and a function, a process, a complex and a concept, our aim is to approach it from the perspective of failure, dysfunctionality, futility, and inoperativeness.

Misfiring, misfitting, misreading: it is all about the prefix. Misnaming, mistaking, misrecognition – the prefix mis- is always amiss: moreover, it is determined by what follows. There is no misnaming without naming, no misrecognition without proper recognition.

Since our broad notion of performance and its possible misfires owe a great deal to Austin’s philosophy of language, rooted as it is in the paradigmatic Western metaphysical dichotomies of play vs. seriousness and success vs. failure, efficiency vs. loss, we are often forced to perceive and value cultural forms and events in terms of binary oppositions. At the same time, modernism embraced the apparently inessential, the misguiding, and the missing as leeway for a new perspective on the very constitution of new cultural systems.

On the one hand, the notions mistake and infelicity are deeply embedded in modern western thought. From the Freudian slip via J. L. Austin’s misfires, the Girardian and the Derridean pharmakos/pharmakon and the Lacanian misrecognition, to Goffmanian breaches in the construction of social reality, Judith Butler’s failed gender-performances and Homi Bhabha´s inappropriate signifiers and anomalous representations, scholars have evaluated the irregular, the unforeseeable, and the unaccountable – in a word, the mistaken – as essential to rethinking the categories of what is right, correct, true, whole and serious.

On the other hand, by abandoning classical ideas of universality and verisimilitude, modernist art transformed mistake into its enabling limit. From Futurist Evenings and Dada´s Cabarets to Action Theatre, Events, Happenings and Performance-Theatre; from performance art to the postdramatic concept of afformance art, performative aesthetic practices not only intentionally exposed themselves to the risk of accident, excess, and contingency, but also managed to harness their liminality as a normative – even marketable – quality.

With a view to exploring a broad range of linguistic, aesthetic, ritual, cultural, organizational and political performances, the conference will deal with the following issues in performance studies, performing arts, theatre studies, literary studies/criticism, linguistics, cultural studies, media studies, gender studies, folklore studies, cultural and political anthropology:

  1. What determines the success and what is the role of “mistake” as an unavoidable (demystifying) element, not only in the realization of a performance but also in its being perceived, appreciated, understood, and interpreted as performance?
  1. Are there “good” and “bad”, humorous and tragic, ethically and/or aesthetically “acceptable” and “unacceptable” performance mistakes?
  1. The misconstrued, the misinterpreted, the misread, the misunderstood – are these culturally fertile or a threat, a pernicious vehicle of ideological distortions and abuses of power, or a royal road to new perspectives and even to resistance to power?
  1. How do bodies fail to perform not only the heterosexual norms of sex/gender identity, but also their very humanity (malformed, sick and disabled bodies, for instance) in art and life?
  1. How do misapplications of forms hybridize cultural gaps (for instance, in the westernization of the post-socialist East and vice versa)?
  1. How to treat revolution as a performative: hence, what could be termed as a failed revolution – a mis-revolution or a missed revolution?
  1. If we take into consideration Virillio’s idea that “new technologies convey a certain kind of accident, one that is no longer local and precisely situated […] but general and affecting the entire world,” can we look at new global technologies of power in the light of accident? What is the role of accident and mishap in the new notion of war?
  1. In what ways are previously misfit, liminal, resistant, or counter-performances being appropriated by the art market and institutions, as well as by the academy and the discursive power of theory?
  1. How does misreading contribute to the queering and, moreover, the “evaporation” of a theory?
  1. Performance is intimately related to humor precisely though misperformance. Bergson defined the comic as the effect of mistake, failure, and quite literally, of slippage. What is the place of the comic in contemporary performance practice?

CALL FOR PROPOSALS

read more